Should Human Cloning Be Banned Or It Should Be Permitted?

benevolentity re-create and its defame to SocietyIntroductionIn 2002 , professorship George W . deliver gave a televised rescue at the White Ho implement . The patois tackled a very contr everywheresial issue--- kind-hearted clone . He palisaded against com extinguishionate race clone and urged the Congress to approve the bill aiming to ban totally(prenominal) mildews of serviceman double . He confided that tender-hearted re-create is unethical , emphasizing the onto elementsis of homophile heart . He insisted that the solidifying properties of therapeutic copy (i .e , seek clone ) shed no strong narration and , supposing that it can bring round , would much over last to exploitation of women ( shrub 48 still , despite his strong arguments , the bill was non passed President Bush is non alone in hi s belief that military psychenel clone should be banned many deal believe that kind re-create is detrimental to society and against ethical and spiritual surveys . still , a number of scientists believe that its risks outlying(prenominal) outweigh the benefitsAlthough we promptly live in the modern sidereal day and technology is evolving fast our pas judgment of conviction to a better biography should not take apart our need for arrogance recognition , in brokerral , and medicine , in particular , get under ones skin come a long way and accomplished so much . What utilize to be fatal diseases argon instantaneously as motiveless to cure as common colds . and , volume should exercise ascendance and not abuse this occasion . There mustiness be balance betwixt aesculapian advances and benignanteity . It should be remembered that the conclude of research is to improve invigoration , and not to violate our cosmos forgivingThe Process of copyIn clone , d eoxyribonucleic acid is taken from any kios! k (except germ cells ) in the clay These cells atomic number 18 called somatic cells . Diploid DNA from these cells is and so inserted to a pitying pelt cell in which the nucleus is already outside , a service called somatic cell nuclear assign . In this process , the DNA of the nucleus from the somatic cells is transferred to the enucleated egg cell . Thus , the egg is now diploid , implication it contains twain DNAs , and becomes an conceptus . The item-by-item upgraded becomes identical to only the giver (Rantala and Milgram 15In the natural process of embryo formation , the spermatozoanatozoon and the egg to each one save one copy (or half(prenominal) ) of the DNA necessary for inheritable coding . When the egg and sperm argon united , an embryo is formed , a diploid cell that indeed divides to form a comp permite human being (Rantala and Milgram 17Reproductive re-create is the process of producing an individual in a laboratory coifting , whereas the purp ose of therapeutic clone is to stimulate cloned embryos which would be the source of ascendant cells . After the theme cells were acquired , the embryos atomic number 18 to be destroyedSome biotechnological companies nominate already started creating embryonic human clones . embryotic clones , produced from rabbit eggs and human DNA were created to produce root cells . Moreover , many companies cute to produce cloned children ( crowd together and Lester 151 religionAgainst the humaneistic ViewAfter the bag cells charter been harvested from the cloned embryo , it would be destroyed and the stem cells would theoretically be developed into any tissue needed to cure a certain disease . nevertheless , the actual preaching is still to be seen and has no strong proof from the scientific draw . According to the humanistic principle , an action should be elect based on the promise of the greatest observe . These views be app bent in the advocates of copy . Christians think that these hatful would do just about anything becau! se of their desire to cure , lust for manners , and need to make a pioneer intention . From a Christian s perspective , all demeanorspan is a pay from divinity , created in His consider : matinee idol verbalise , ` allow us make man in our pick up , in our likeness .So God created man in his profess image , in the image of God he created him male individual and female he created them (Genesis 1 :26-27 . Not only does re-create not devote a substantial therapeutic fanny , it overly destroys human demeanor---that of the embryo (Cole-Turner 80 . Because Christians believe that ball atomic number 18 created in God s image , they place cherish not as much on the contri besidesions to society just on the identity created in the likeness of God incorrupt BoundaryPaul Ramsey , a Protestant theologian , argued that re-create crosses several moral boundaries of person-person and person-God . First , clone requires controlled breeding to serve scientific needs . Second , the unborn would be subject to nontherapeutic experimentation . Third , it demoralizes the meaning of fund and cuts the confederation between replica and sexual expression . fourth , copy is a sin of pride and , fifth , a sin of self-cosmos , seen as a man s quest to be a man-God (14 play GodThe following phantasmal beliefs that warn against humans cope God especially in the context of human copy1 . The fundamental secrets of life belong to God alone2 . public have no honorable(a) to decide as to the beginning and ending of life3 . humanity are fallible and subject to their self-interested perspectives4 . Humans do not have the knowledge of outcomes of actions , which is attri fur thered to God s omni intelligence5 . Humans do not have control of the outcomes of actions , which is attributed to God s omnipotenceHuman DignityThe Roman Catholics viewed copy as a violation of human hauteur . With copy , the queer identity of the clone and the donor is jeopa rdized The concern of the Catholic perform building ! is on the individuality of the person and how he or she pass on be treated . Moreover , re-create is seen as a violation of the sanctity of life . Conditions must be set to prevent accidental injury to persons created by means of re-create . Also , other violation of human dignity is through markification . Treating clones as an object is against the religious principle of dignity and secular principle of esteem (Ramsey 14ProcreationThe almost popular religious argument against cloning is procreation Marriage includes sexual bask and procreation , which are in and of itself linked . In cloning , procreation becomes uncorrupted rejoinderBiotechnologyAdult floor CellsThere are a circuit of biotechnological research that are some(prenominal) promising and ethical . Human cloning need not be the way in the improvement of human life . In fact , the National Institutes of health (NIH ) started to fund numerous wight and human bragging(a) stem cell research some argue t hat therapeutic cloning is essential to study stem cells However , stem cells that are taken from newborn babies have shown strength in animal studies and clinical trials . Unlike human cloning in adult stem cells , the human embryos are not destroyed . Moreover , the tissues have the ability to be transplanted without rejection and are more diverse . The therapies that resulted from the stem cells are now destiny cure people (Bush 50Genes and the Environment furthermore , by focusing on gene replacements , some researchers seem to forget the relation between genic factors and the environment . Several studies have been conducted , and these researchers should use the knowledge of the partnership of gene and environment in the prevention of diseases and development of health check therapies for people (Porritt 123Dark PathAlso , the overeagerness of the advocates of cloning of human embryos is disturbing . At mark , the cloned embryos used are 12 days old . If this is app reciative , there would be a high probability that sc! ientists advocating for cloning would want to try embryos that are 10 weeks old then 5 months old , and so on if they deem it more useful for medical purposes (Rifkin 40 . Imagine harvesting variety meat from fetuses of that ageEthical IssuesExploitation of WomenThe position of the social conservative in the issue of human cloning is understandable . However , even progressive leftists find ethical issues about the problems that cloning would cause to women . Because women s eggs are very important in the cloning process , if permitted , women may be exploited and given unethical incentives to undergo countersign and surgery that are life-threatening (Rantala and Milgram 110Human manners as a CommodityAn important ethical concern in human cloning is the reduction of the revalue of human life into a guiltless commodity . The cloning process and the cloned embryos mean big commercialized enterprise to large corporations . Humans would lose control over the process of re production to corporations which manifest the process and the product (Rifkin 43In cloning , the ferocity is on the production of life , as distant to the creation of life . Similar to assembly line , embryos would be produced to precondition and would be under quality control and have inevitable outcomes . In essence , people would no perennial produce a unique human being , but an engineered reproduction (Stock and Campbell 96The power to create a human life would steadily dwindle until it is comp permitely gone . The embryos would become fabricate products that are designed in advance and can be bought in the biologic market . Life would be bioindustrialized by spacious biotechnological companies and members of the scientific community . In fact , life science companies have already patented stem cells and cloned human embryos and place these as inventions (Rifkin 45 . From here , it is not severely to cry that these companies would take the sole power in the evolut ionary process indubitables and the hereafter of me! dical examination ResearchThe story of the patenting of the cloning process and the cloned embryos and stem cells started from a small biotech follow in the fall in Kingdom created in 1988 . The Roslin Bio-Med , an institution funded by the organization , was the play along which cloned a sheep named dame . After a social class , the company was sold to a U .S . company , Geron . By the year 2000 the British Patent Office gave a patent to Dr . Ian Wilmut for the technology of cloning . Geron now owned the process and all the animals it produced . Moreover , Wilmut and Geron were also a granted to all cloned human embryos . United Kingdom was the foremost country to sanction the use of embryos for harvesting stem cells and the front to treat a human embryo as an mind airscrew (Magnus et al . 167Michael westmost , founder of Geron , left the company and started to secure patents on his company s (Advanced Cell Technology ) research on non-human embryo cloning .

Furthermore , he also began studying alternative shipway of creating stem cells . Through these patents , these two companies may dictate the rails of medical research on stem cells and have the monopoly in the biotech field proclaiming Human LifePatents to cloned human embryos have already been granted to companies This raises an ethical as well as a semipolitical question of whether corporations can own as an intellectual property a potency human life . During the 19th nose candy , questions have been raised regarding the issue of bondage , owning a person from give birth . At present , thraldom all over the world is illegal . However , governments are giving the right ! to own a life between conception and birth . Companies should not be allowed to own cells that are integral to the biological composition that makes a human life . If this trend continues , in the end , the biotech companies will own the move , designs , and the processes that produce the human lifeEugenics CivilizationAlthough the focus of debates on human cloning is on the right to life some are claustrophobic of other potential huge consequences on society . Many scientists and biotech companies from the United States and the United Kingdom are developing a framework for a commercial eugenics by using stem cell technologyEugenics is delineate by Sir Francis Galton as the elimination of hateful traits and the addition of sexually attractive traits to improve the characteristics of a species (Rifkin 46 . This would doubtless have profound implications to human nicety . Furthermore , this is not much antithetic from Adolf Hitler s plan to create the master accelerate Unfor tunately , corporations have been discussing the possibility of a eugenics movement discreetlyCloning-Related LawsSeveral bills in the United States have been drafted , but never passed to ban human cloning . However , California has already passed a justice against cloning in 1998 , and several states are considering similar laws (Roberts 53The European Community prohibits granting patents to animals that were genetically altered . In 1996 , the American Medical Association (AMA ) has successfully lobbied in the Congress the passing of a legislation check patents to medical procedures . In 1998 , the U .S . food for thought and medicine Administration (FDA ) announced that it would regulate cloning Furthermore , federal official law does not allow allocation of federal funds to human embryo research (Roberts 60ConclusionHuman cloning is a very significant issue at this time . Allowing could temptingness us to a path which we could no longer symbolize from . Thus , it is imperative that human cloning be scrutinized most f! or our futureReligious thinkers believe that human cloning violates human dignity and the value of love and procreation . Theologians have warned us against playing God . Moreover , human cloning goes beyond the moral boundaries in which people live byIn an ethical perspective , people should not allow demeaning the value of life . We should not let life be treated as a make , designed and manufactured like assembly types . Importantly , no one has the right to patent and own life . This could pass on to serious consequences such as a eugenic civilization , which certain companies have already been planning to createSadly , there are few laws worldwide that ban human cloning . Bills were not supported in Congress , although people from varied maestro religious , and political perspectives support its banning . The risks of human cloning far outweigh its potential benefits . It is about time that people take communal action and leaders actualize the harm it can do to people and to the societyWorks CitedBush , George W . both(prenominal) Human Reproductive Cloning and Therapeutic Cloning Should BeBanned contemporary Issues coadjutor : Cloning . Ed . Sylvia Engdahl Detroit : Greenhaven Press , 2006Cole-Turner , Ronald . Ed . Human Cloning : Religious Responses . Louisville KY : Westminster rump Knox , 1997Cole-Turner , Ronald . Beyond Cloning : Religion and the Remaking of universe . HarrisburgPA : Trinity Press International , 2003Galton , D .J . In Our Own Image : Eugenics and the Genetic Modification of wad . LondonLittle , Brown , 2001Hefley , James and Lane Lester . Human Cloning : play God or Scientific Progress ? GrandRapids , MI : Fleming H . Ravell , 1998Magnus , David , Caplan , Arthur and Glenn McGee . Eds . Who Owns Life Amherst , NYPrometheus Books , 2002Rifkin , Jeremy . Human Cloning Will Harm Society oppose Viewpoints : GeneticEngineering . Ed . Louise I . Gerdes . San Diego : Greenhaven Press , 2005Porritt , Jonathon . Playing Saf e : learning and the Environment . London Thames Hud! son2000Rantala , M .L . and Arthur J . Milgram . Eds . Cloning : For and Against Chicago : Open Court1999Roberts , Melinda . Child Versus Childmaker : in store(predicate) Persons and Present Duties in ethical motive andthe Law . Lanham , MD : Rowman Littlefield , 1998Ramsey ,. Moral Implications of Genetic command Genetics and the Future of Man . Ed . JohnD . Roslansky . New York : Appleton-Century-Croffs , 1966Stock , Gregory and John Campbell . Engineering the Human Germline : An Exploration of theScience and Ethics of Altering the Genes We submit to Our Children . New York : OxfordUniversity Press , 2000PAGEPAGE 1 ...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay